SEC Won’t Approve a Bitcoin ETF: Insights from John Reed Stark

Photo - SEC Won’t Approve a Bitcoin ETF: Insights from John Reed Stark
Will the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission give the nod to any of the recent spot bitcoin ETF applications? Former SEC official and well-known crypto skeptic John Reed Stark has shared some surprising insights.
John Reed Stark believes the present-day SEC might not approve spot bitcoin-ETFs. He draws attention to an analysis from Better Markets, a nonprofit organization established post the 2008 financial crisis with a mission to champion public interests in the financial sector. They have publicly stated several reasons why green-lighting bitcoin ETFs would be an inexcusable blunder by the Commission. 
The spot bitcoin markets (1) have a history of artificially inflated trading volumes due to rampant manipulation and wash trading; (2) are highly concentrated; and (3) rely on a select group of individuals and entities to maintain bitcoin’s network,
Better Markets pointed out.
Analysts suggest that these characteristics render spot BTC-ETFs particularly susceptible to fraudulent schemes, jeopardizing potential investors. Stark stands in agreement with Better Markets, emphasizing the peril of bitcoin-based exchange products.

Interestingly, Stark, having held a pivotal position at the SEC, indicates that there's a perceptible bias in the current crypto regulation. This raises eyebrows: shouldn't regulations be impartial?
President Donald Trump, Secretary Hillary Clinton, and Congresswoman Maxine Waters all shared the same view about crypto i.e. that crypto was a dangerous and horrific plague,
Stark reminisces.
Stark underscores that the rigorous crypto scrutiny by the SEC gained momentum under Chairman Jay Clayton, known for his Republican affiliations. This development hints at a cross-party agreement concerning regulatory approaches.  
Chair Clayton served as a fierce and relentless crypto critic and boasts a hefty multi-year track record of anti-crypto speeches and Congressional testimony,
Stark observes.
The political landscape, however, is evidently changing. Stark envisions that post-election, particularly if there's a shift in the nation's leadership, the approach to crypto regulation might experience a sea change. He foresees that under a Republican president, the SEC could demonstrate a softer and more favorable stance on matters that currently meet sharp disapproval from the Commission, including the bitcoin ETFs.
Hence, should a Republican get elected President, Chair Gensler would likely resign and the senior Republican appointed SEC Commissioner (in this case famed 'crypto-mom' HesterPeirce) would possibly become acting Chair,
Stark speculates.
In this case, most of the current Commission's regulatory initiatives concerning the crypto industry would sharply come to a halt, believes the former SEC division chief.  Thanks for the forecast, Mr. Stark! As the saying goes, from your lips to God's ears.